Etbrandequity updated: march 13, 2022, 00:42 ist imagine waking up on a wednesday morning, picking up your phone to do your regular social media browsing and just as you open your instagram , it crashes. Move on to facebook , that crashes as well. Now you want to see if #facebookdown and #instagramdown is trending on twitter. You go on to twitter and much to your horror, that crashes as well! on 25th may, more than half of social media users of india, imagined this scenario as the news of the possible ban of platforms like facebook, instagram and twitter went around, due to non-compliance with the centre’s intermediary guidelines. process

Austin, tx, july 7, 2022 — a texas republican announced he will file a bill to raise the age limit for using social media to 18 when the legislature reconvenes next year. On tues day , state rep. Jared patterson (r-frisco) tweeted , “it’s long past time to recognize the incredible harm social media is doing to the mental health of young texans. Next session, we put an end to it. ”“i’ll be introducing legislation next session to ban minors from using social media. ”patterson’s statement was in response to a post on the conservative texas public policy foundation’s (tppf) cannon online calling for limits on minors’ ability to use social media.

Looks like the long arm of the texas government could soon try to snatch up your kid’s iphone. In a tweet earlier this week, state rep. Jared patterson announced that he’s got big plans for next year ’s legislative session. The frisco republican said he’ll file a bill that would ban social media use for all texas minors. Patterson’s utopia would see the minimum age for social media use raised from 13 to 18, when teens become legal adults. “it’s long past time to recognize the incredible harm social media is doing to the mental health of young texans,” he said in a tweet.

Sri lanka ordered civil servants on wednesday not to express opinions on social media after some officials claimed schoolchildren were fainting from a lack of food due to the country’s dire economic crisis. In a fresh order to 1. 5 million state employees, the ministry of public administration and management said a long-established ban on speaking to reporters now extends to social media posts. “expressing opinions on social media by a public officer. Shall constitute an offence that leads to taking disciplinary action,” the order said. It followed claims from provincial health officials and teachers that dozens of students were fainting in schools because of a lack of food.

Should children not be allowed on social media?

For a few weeks now , state rep. Jared patterson (r-frisco) has been stumping -- on social media, perhaps ironically -- for a bill he's proposing in which all the major social media companies would face penalties for targeting children to use their services. The idea, patterson says, is similar in concept to how it has been made disadvantageous for cigarette companies to advertise to kids following the surgeon general report on smoking in 1964. specific On this week's episode of y'all-itics , patterson joins the jasons to further discuss his proposal. Over the course of their chat, patterson and the jasons touch on everything from the first amendment and parental rights to why the state legislator thinks parents stand no chance against the algorithms that social media companies are using the target their children.

Use student social media "mistakes" as opportunities to teach, not punish. I learned this valuable lesson from my former assistant principals, jennifer hogan and holly sutherland. Not only did these two brilliant educators model social media use as an important and valuable education tool, they also gently monitored student social media use. When a student inevitably used social media in a less-than-desirable way, they would take the opportunity to discuss, not admonish, their decision-making process. This allowed students to "fail" within the safe confines of school and learn from their mistakes before similar as unguarded adults could have lifelong consequences.

Culture joe rogan social media influencers podcast joe rogan insists that andrew tate offered a "good lesson" to his followers before his social media ban when it came to his "pro-male" content. Last month, tate's accounts on instagram and facebook were deleted after he was accused of making misogynistic comments, including some that could incite violence against women, sparking fury online. The former kickboxer was also accused of putting out content that would be potentially harmful to impressionable young men. Facebook parent company meta confirmed to newsweek that tate was no longer allowed to use both social media platforms due to violating company policies.

Now the families of the teenagers are looking to hold social media companies accountable. In the digital age, it is not uncommon for many children and teens to use social media to connect with others around the world. However, studies have shown there are negative consequences to extreme social media use at a young age. The filtered portrayal of others’ lives on social media can often leave the viewer with feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem , which are common symptoms of mental illnesses like depression, eating disorders, and substance abuse. A study by jama psychiatry found that adolescents who spend more than three hours a day on social media are at a heightened risk for developing mental health problems.

Escalating Censorship During the Ukraine Invasion

Many states have become concerned with russian cyberattacks and online propaganda. The ukrainian government responded to the information threat in 2017 by blocking access to several russian websites, including vkontakte, one of the most popular social media websites in ukraine. By exploiting a natural experiment in ukraine, i find that the sudden censorship policy reduced activity on vkontakte, despite the fact that a vast majority of the users were legally and technically able to bypass the ban. Users with strong political and social affiliations to russia were at least as likely to be affected by the ban as those with weak affiliations.

Why Should We Ban Social Media?

Re-posts and retweets say that social media sites will begin banning users who post photos of confederate flags. The facts: on june 26, the people of lancaster website published an article that announced the ban would start july 1. The article went on to say that facebook and instagram would ban users for a week for the first offense, a month for the second offense and a permanent ban for the third offense. Twitter, the article said, will automatically delete the photos and advise users to log back in under a new terms of service agreement, which could lead to a permanent ban if users post the flag more than once, snopes.

Pinterest is the place to go for inspiration on everything from recipes to re-decorating. Now it may inspire change within its own industry. Pinterest, which has 431 million active users, is the first major social media platform to ban content that denies the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and influenced by human activity. The new rules, announced in april, apply to both posts and ads. "we repeatedly heard from experts that climate misinformation, including climate change denying narratives, is causing real harm by impeding meaningful climate action," says pinterest’s policy head sarah bromma. Climate disinformation pollutes every social media platform, but is especially prolific on facebook and twitter.

Social media giants like facebook, twitter, whatsapp and instagram may face ban in india if they fail to comply with the new intermediary guidelines for social media platforms. The three-month deadline given by the ministry of electronics & information technology (meity) to accept these guidelines ends today i. E. May 25 but none of the giants have so far accepted the new regulations. The rules will be effective from tomorrow despite these companies seeking a total six-month delay in their implementation. Homegrown social media platform koo, which is the indian version of twitter, is the only platform that has so far accepted the centre's intermediary guidelines.

Seen as a step to curtail freedoms, bypassed nonetheless by tech-savvy youth protesters by sumudu chamara since the beginning of the protests, the government made various attempts, some of which were futile, to control protests, and one such step aimed at dealing with rapidly growing protests was the temporary ban on social media platforms such as facebook, twitter, youtube, whatsapp, viber and tiktok. The ban on social media commenced at night last saturday (2), and amidst public opposition and criticism against the move, it was ended on the evening of sunday (3). Effectiveness of the social media ban even though banning social media platforms and mobile communication apps to restrict the public voice was seen during the tenure of former president maithripala sirisena following the 2019 easter sunday attacks, this time, the biggest question was not the ban, but how effective it was to curtail public opinions.

Why We Like Nudity?

Facebook bans all nudity—defined to include female but not male nipples. In response, female-bodied users have sometimes protested by photoshopping male nipples on top of their own to highlight the seemingly arbitrary nature of the rule. Breastfeeding mothers also bristled at not being able share pics of their babies nursing. After years of protest (in which mothers argued facebook’s rules, in fact, contributed to sexualizing nursing ) facebook added an exemption for nursing pics. Instagram has similar rules to facebook (which has owned it since 2012). In 2015, dazed reported on revisions to instagram previously vague policy on nudity.